Why remove roads, buildings and water first?
They are not land you can plant, so leaving them in inflates every area and share. Cutting them out first means the terrain, canopy and degraded land numbers describe the land a project could use.
How much of this property is land you could work, and what is on it? The analysis first cuts out roads, buildings and water, then runs terrain aspect and slope, canopy height and degraded land on what remains, so every number refers to that land.
Pilot. Its road data covers Panama.
Get a first read of a candidate property in one step, on its land area rather than the area on the title.
Compare properties on the same measures before deciding which ones to visit.
Start a site plan from the workable area, its slopes and its open land.
A property boundary as a polygon. There are no settings: it runs with fixed defaults.
Run it as the first look at a candidate property, before a site visit. The land figure feeds an early feasibility estimate; the single analyses go deeper where a question matters.
They are not land you can plant, so leaving them in inflates every area and share. Cutting them out first means the terrain, canopy and degraded land numbers describe the land a project could use.
No. It runs each step at a fixed version with its defaults, so properties compare like for like. Run the single analyses to use your own thresholds.
No. Run forest cover analysis beside it for tree cover in 2000 and the loss since.
The others still report, and the failed step says why. The whole run stops only if preparing the property fails (for example, an invalid boundary or no land left after the cut) or every step fails.
Tell us about the properties you are looking at, and we will set the analyses up in your project.
Bring in the spreadsheets, field forms and maps you already use, and see every site in one place.